We understand the basic terms of evolution and where are the points of contention!

Did LUCA exist then morph through mutation and selection to everything else?

Was there an RNA-world prior to life as we know it today?

The cell is a metropolis with magnificent inhabitants, transportation systems, and cargo ships! We examine this and whether evolution can explain its existence!

A claim that life originated from a simple cell to complex life necessitate the continuous addition of information and complexity of function and appearance; summed as novelty. The evolutionary paradigm fails to explain how novelty can be generated through its alleged mechanisms.

Antibiotic resistance is falsely popularized as evidence for evolution, we explain why

The hyper sophistication of the genetic code transcription and translation process from gene to protein make accepting design an obvious choice.

The discovery of giant viruses calls for a review of the tree of life, and even more!

An amazing machine like flagella scream design, yet has no explanation under the evolutionary paradigm other that kicking the can down the road!

ToE claims that Natural Selection can filter out the randomness of mutations and preserve the right changes to maintain and sophisticate life! Is this consistent with observation!

Enzymes are essential for life, but life is what produces enzymes; is there a solution for this paradox?

We are confronted over and over again with evidence from adaptation and extrapolations into origins of species; but is this a fair extrapolation?

Can cell membranes with all their amazing complexity be explained by ToE, but even more the dependence of life of them poses an obvious chicken and egg paradox!

ATP is the energy currency of the cell, yet the complexity of the ATP cycle and ATPase enzyme creates a paradox of what comes first!

Beyond the Cambrian, the theory of evolution cannot explain the jump in the phylogeny tree of even the smallest creatures, bacteria! A seldom talked-about subject!

Evolutionists insist that ERV's provide strong evidence of human-chimp common ancestry, but as discovery unfolds it turns our that their argument is one from ignorance, judging on a phenomena that we know so little about, and then finding out that we were missing so many pieces of the puzzle.

Evolutionists insist that nested hierarchies are evidence for evolution, but are they so?